DGRE vs QQQ
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DGRE delivered stronger 1-year returns. DGRE offers more diversification with 272 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DGRE | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $149M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 272 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +27.07% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +46.32% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.87% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.55% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2013 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DGRE vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DGRE returned +46.32% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, DGRE is up 27.07% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, DGRE compounded at +23.87% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.55% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +4.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.2% for DGRE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.0% for DGRE and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DGRE charges 0.32% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $18 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DGRE currently yields 1.32% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DGRE and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 371 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DGRE or QQQ?
DGRE has an expense ratio of 0.32% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DGRE or QQQ?
Over the past year DGRE returned +46.32% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so DGRE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), DGRE annualized +4.59% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DGRE or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.2% for DGRE. Worst drawdown: DGRE -40.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DGRE and QQQ?
DGRE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DGRE and QQQ?
DGRE and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 371 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DGRE or QQQ?
DGRE yields 1.32% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DGRE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.