DGRS vs QQQ
WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. DGRS offers more diversification with 201 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DGRS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $408M | $486.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.04% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 201 | 107 | |
| YTD Return | +19.67% | +15.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.13% | +25.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.76% | +24.04% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.09% | +13.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -45.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2013 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DGRS vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DGRS returned +20.13% while QQQ returned +25.71%. Year to date, DGRS is up 19.67% versus a gain of 15.69% for QQQ.
Over three years, DGRS compounded at +14.76% per year against +24.04% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.09% and +13.89% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.98% annualized vs +8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.4% for DGRS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.7% for DGRS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DGRS charges 0.38% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $18 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DGRS currently yields 2.04% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DGRS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 300 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DGRS or QQQ?
DGRS has an expense ratio of 0.38% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DGRS or QQQ?
Over the past year DGRS returned +20.13% vs +25.71% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), DGRS annualized +8.05% vs +12.98% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DGRS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.4% for DGRS. Worst drawdown: DGRS -45.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DGRS and QQQ?
DGRS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DGRS and QQQ?
DGRS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 300 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DGRS or QQQ?
DGRS yields 2.04% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DGRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.