DGRS vs VTI
WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DGRS or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DGRS is less concentrated, with 18.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DGRS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $401M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.07% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 201 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +16.01%Best | +14.05% |
| 1Y Return | +15.92% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.63% | +22.65%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.39% | +12.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,960 | $17,988Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.6%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2013 to Sep 22, 2026 (13.2 years).
DGRS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.2 years both funds cover.
DGRS vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DGRS returned +15.92% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, DGRS is up 16.01% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Over three years, DGRS compounded at +14.63% per year against +22.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.39% and +12.46% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.48% annualized vs +7.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DGRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 14.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.7% for DGRS and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DGRS charges 0.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DGRS currently yields 2.07% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.1% of DGRS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's money is in holdings DGRS also owns.
Most of DGRS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
195 positions in common, counted across the 198 positions we hold weights for in DGRS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 201 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,112 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DGRS (97.1% of the fund), and 2 for DGRS that do not appear in VTI (0.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DGRS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VCTRVictory Receivables Corp | 2.57% | 0.01% | 2.56% |
| AVTAvnet Inc | 2.43% | 0.01% | 2.42% |
| AROCArchrock, Inc. | 2.26% | 0.01% | 2.25% |
| CRCCalifornia Resources Corp Common Stock | 1.77% | 0.01% | 1.76% |
| CNSCohen & Steers Inc | 1.72% | 0.00% | 1.72% |
| IPARInter Parfums Inc | 1.71% | 0.00% | 1.71% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 1.67% | 0.01% | 1.66% |
| MGYMagnolia Oil & Gas Corp | 1.52% | 0.01% | 1.51% |
| KFYKorn Ferry | 1.49% | 0.01% | 1.48% |
| NOGNorthern Oil And Gas Inc | 1.47% | 0.00% | 1.47% |
99.1% of DGRS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DGRS or VTI?
DGRS has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DGRS or VTI?
Over the past year DGRS returned +15.92% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), DGRS annualized +7.76% vs +12.48% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DGRS or VTI?
DGRS has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 14.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DGRS -45.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both DGRS and VTI?
DGRS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DGRS and VTI?
99.1% of DGRS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's is in holdings DGRS also owns. They hold 195 positions in common, counted across the 198 positions we hold weights for in DGRS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DGRS or VTI?
DGRS yields 2.07% while VTI yields 1.03%, so DGRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DGRS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DGRS is less concentrated, with 18.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.