DIME vs IVV
CoinShares Altcoins ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DIME or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
DIME has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 86.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIME | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $3M | $879.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 14 | 509 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 67.6% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -72.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $4,066 | $11,563Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 86.6% | 37.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Valkyrie Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 24 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DIME has data through Oct 20, 2026 and IVV through Nov 13, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 7, 2025 to Oct 20, 2026 (1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DIME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.6% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.6% for DIME and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIME charges 0.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIME currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 13 holdings in DIME and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.9% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 13 positions we hold weights for in DIME and 490 in IVV, against full books of 14 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 485 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DIME (98.8% of the fund), and 1 for DIME that do not appear in IVV (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DIME and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIME or IVV?
DIME has an expense ratio of 0.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. DIME is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DIME or IVV?
DIME has been the more volatile fund at 67.6% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DIME -72.6% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both DIME and IVV?
DIME and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIME or IVV?
DIME yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DIME?
DIME has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 86.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.