DIME vs IVV
CoinShares Altcoins ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DIME or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
DIME has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 83.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIME | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $1M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 14 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -34.48% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | -66.19% | +15.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.61% |
| Top 10 Weight | 83.9% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Valkyrie Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DIME vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DIME vs IVV Performance
CoinShares Altcoins ETF (DIME) is an ETF from Valkyrie Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DIME returned -66.19% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, DIME is down 34.48% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIME charges 0.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIME currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 13 holdings in DIME and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.7% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 13 positions we hold weights for in DIME and 490 in IVV, against full books of 14 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DIME (98.6% of the fund), and 2 for DIME that do not appear in IVV (8.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DIME and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIME or IVV?
DIME has an expense ratio of 0.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. DIME is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DIME or IVV?
Over the past year DIME returned -66.19% vs +15.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIME or IVV?
DIME yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DIME?
DIME has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 83.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.