DISO vs IVV
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DISO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 43.83% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -9.37% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -10.67% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
DISO vs IVV Performance
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DISO returned -10.67% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, DISO is down 9.37% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DISO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for DISO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DISO charges 1.32% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $3 annually, a gap of $129 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DISO currently yields 43.83% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DISO and IVV share 1 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DISO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIS | 1.09% | 0.26% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DISO or IVV?
DISO has an expense ratio of 1.32% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $129 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DISO or IVV?
Over the past year DISO returned -10.67% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DISO annualized +4.73% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DISO or IVV?
DISO has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DISO -26.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DISO and IVV?
DISO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DISO and IVV?
DISO and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DISO or IVV?
DISO yields 43.83% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DISO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.