DLLL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DLLL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DLLL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $150M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +699.76% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +621.67% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 224.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
DLLL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DLLL returned +621.67% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, DLLL is up 699.76% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DLLL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 224.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.6% for DLLL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DLLL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DLLL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DLLL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DLLL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DELL | 66.69% | 0.17% | 66.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DLLL or VTI?
DLLL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DLLL or VTI?
Over the past year DLLL returned +621.67% vs +22.35% for VTI, so DLLL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DLLL annualized +290.76% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DLLL or VTI?
DLLL has been the more volatile fund at 224.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DLLL -68.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DLLL and VTI?
DLLL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DLLL and VTI?
DLLL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DLLL or VTI?
DLLL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.