DMXF vs VTI
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DMXF or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DMXF led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMXF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $950M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.09% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 423 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.33%Best | +11.65% |
| 1Y Return | +18.74%Best | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.18% | +20.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.57% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,403 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 18, 2020 to Sep 10, 2026 (6.2 years).
DMXF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
DMXF vs VTI Performance
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DMXF returned +18.74% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, DMXF is up 13.33% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, DMXF compounded at +18.18% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.57% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +16.22% annualized vs +11.89%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for DMXF and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMXF charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMXF currently yields 4.09% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.3% of DMXF's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
DMXF and VTI share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 403 positions we hold weights for in DMXF and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 423 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DMXF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI:PAAir Liquide Sa | 1.15% | 0.00% | 1.15% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.19% | 0.44% | 0.25% |
| SUNBSunbelt Rentals | 0.30% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
| MTX:SGMtu Aero Engines Ag | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.21% |
| UMG:ASUniversal Music Group NV | 0.15% | 0.05% | 0.10% |
| FBK:MIFinecobank S.P.A. | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.16% |
| SIG:AUSigma Pharmaceuticals Ltd | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| SGP:AUStockland | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DMXF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMXF or VTI?
DMXF has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DMXF or VTI?
Over the past year DMXF returned +18.74% vs +17.34% for VTI, so DMXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), DMXF annualized +11.89% vs +16.22% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DMXF or VTI?
DMXF has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DMXF -34.5% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both DMXF and VTI?
DMXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DMXF and VTI?
At least 2.3% of DMXF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 403 positions we hold weights for in DMXF and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMXF or VTI?
DMXF yields 4.09% while VTI yields 1.03%, so DMXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DMXF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DMXF led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.