DNOV vs VXUS
DNOV vs VXUS
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DNOV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $395M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +6.84% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.08% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.53% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.42% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
DNOV vs VXUS Performance
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DNOV returned +15.08% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, DNOV is up 6.84% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, DNOV compounded at +12.53% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.42% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, DNOV has the edge at +8.30% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.8% for DNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for DNOV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DNOV charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DNOV currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
DNOV and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DNOV or VXUS?
DNOV has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DNOV or VXUS?
Over the past year DNOV returned +15.08% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), DNOV annualized +8.30% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DNOV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.8% for DNOV. Worst drawdown: DNOV -15.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both DNOV and VXUS?
DNOV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DNOV and VXUS?
DNOV and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DNOV or VXUS?
DNOV yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.