DOG vs IVV
ProShares Short Dow30 vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DOG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $101M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.38% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -7.49% | +12.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.60% | +20.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -9.38% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.86% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -93.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
DOG vs IVV Performance
ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DOG returned -12.60% while IVV returned +20.70%. Year to date, DOG is down 7.49% versus a gain of 12.96% for IVV.
Over three years, DOG compounded at -9.38% per year against +22.10% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -5.86% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs -11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.2% for DOG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.3% for DOG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.92. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DOG charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DOG currently yields 3.38% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DOG and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DOG or IVV?
DOG has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DOG or IVV?
Over the past year DOG returned -12.60% vs +20.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DOG annualized -11.28% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DOG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.2% for DOG. Worst drawdown: DOG -93.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DOG and IVV?
DOG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.92, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DOG and IVV?
DOG and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DOG or IVV?
DOG yields 3.38% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.