DRIP vs QQQ
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bear 2X ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 107 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRIP | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $106M | $486.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.97% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 107 | |
| YTD Return | -61.26% | +15.95% | |
| 1Y Return | -60.13% | +26.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -27.90% | +24.11% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -46.20% | +13.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 91.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 28, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DRIP vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bear 2X ETF (DRIP) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DRIP returned -60.13% while QQQ returned +26.00%. Year to date, DRIP is down 61.26% versus a gain of 15.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, DRIP compounded at -27.90% per year against +24.11% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -46.20% and +13.95% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.99% annualized vs -42.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DRIP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 91.2% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for DRIP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRIP charges 1.01% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $18 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRIP currently yields 3.97% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DRIP and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRIP or QQQ?
DRIP has an expense ratio of 1.01% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DRIP or QQQ?
Over the past year DRIP returned -60.13% vs +26.00% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DRIP annualized -42.06% vs +12.99% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DRIP or QQQ?
DRIP has been the more volatile fund at 91.2% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: DRIP -100.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DRIP and QQQ?
DRIP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DRIP and QQQ?
DRIP and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRIP or QQQ?
DRIP yields 3.97% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DRIP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.