DUKX vs IVV
Ocean Park International ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUKX | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +9.52% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.46% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Ocean Park Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
DUKX vs IVV Performance
Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) is a ETF from Ocean Park Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DUKX returned +19.46% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, DUKX is up 9.52% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.4% for DUKX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for DUKX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUKX charges 1.03% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $3 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUKX currently yields 1.94% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DUKX and IVV share 0 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUKX or IVV?
DUKX has an expense ratio of 1.03% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $100 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DUKX or IVV?
Over the past year DUKX returned +19.46% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DUKX annualized +8.57% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DUKX or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.4% for DUKX. Worst drawdown: DUKX -19.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DUKX and IVV?
DUKX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DUKX and IVV?
DUKX and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUKX or IVV?
DUKX yields 1.94% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DUKX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.