DUKX vs IVV
Ocean Park International ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DUKX or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUKX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.88% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 13 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.32% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.68% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $11,884 | $14,094Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 94.9% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Ocean Park Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.2 years).
DUKX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
DUKX vs IVV Performance
Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) is an ETF from Ocean Park Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DUKX returned +14.68% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, DUKX is up 9.32% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUKX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 12.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for DUKX and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUKX charges 1.03% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $3 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUKX currently yields 1.88% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in DUKX and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.7% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in DUKX and 490 in IVV, against full books of 13 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 12 and 490 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions DUKX does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DUKX and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUKX or IVV?
DUKX has an expense ratio of 1.03% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $100 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUKX or IVV?
Over the past year DUKX returned +14.68% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DUKX annualized +8.16% vs +16.88% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUKX or IVV?
DUKX has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 12.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DUKX -19.6% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both DUKX and IVV?
DUKX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUKX or IVV?
DUKX yields 1.88% while IVV yields 1.06%, so DUKX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DUKX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.