DUKX vs VTI
Ocean Park International ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUKX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.52% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.46% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Ocean Park Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
DUKX vs VTI Performance
Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) is a ETF from Ocean Park Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DUKX returned +19.46% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, DUKX is up 9.52% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.4% for DUKX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for DUKX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUKX charges 1.03% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $3 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUKX currently yields 1.94% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DUKX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2798 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUKX or VTI?
DUKX has an expense ratio of 1.03% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $100 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DUKX or VTI?
Over the past year DUKX returned +19.46% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DUKX annualized +8.57% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DUKX or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.4% for DUKX. Worst drawdown: DUKX -19.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DUKX and VTI?
DUKX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DUKX and VTI?
DUKX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2798 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUKX or VTI?
DUKX yields 1.94% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DUKX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.