DVUT vs IVV
WEBs Utilities XLU Defined Volatility ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DVUT or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVUT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $124,654 | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.5% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $10,549 | $12,238Best |
| Fund Family | WEBs Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 21 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DVUT has data through Aug 26, 2026 and IVV through Sep 16, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Aug 26, 2026 (1.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DVUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 12.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.5% for DVUT and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVUT charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVUT currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in DVUT and 490 in IVV, totalling 52.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in DVUT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 4 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DVUT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVUT or IVV?
DVUT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DVUT or IVV?
DVUT has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 12.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DVUT -18.5% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both DVUT and IVV?
DVUT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVUT or IVV?
DVUT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DVUT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.