DVXF vs VTI
WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVXF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $438M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.52% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.65% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WEBs Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
DVXF vs VTI Performance
WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) is a ETF from WEBs Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DVXF returned +19.65% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, DVXF is up 7.52% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DVXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.7% for DVXF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVXF charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
DVXF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVXF or VTI?
DVXF has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DVXF or VTI?
Over the past year DVXF returned +19.65% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DVXF annualized +15.80% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DVXF or VTI?
DVXF has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DVXF -26.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DVXF and VTI?
DVXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DVXF and VTI?
DVXF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.