DVYA vs VTI
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DVYA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVYA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $72M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.31% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.58% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.33% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.72% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.47% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
DVYA vs VTI Performance
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DVYA returned +31.33% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, DVYA is up 18.58% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, DVYA compounded at +23.72% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.47% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +2.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DVYA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.6% for DVYA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVYA charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVYA currently yields 4.31% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DVYA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2838 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVYA or VTI?
DVYA has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DVYA or VTI?
Over the past year DVYA returned +31.33% vs +21.39% for VTI, so DVYA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), DVYA annualized +2.29% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DVYA or VTI?
DVYA has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DVYA -59.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DVYA and VTI?
DVYA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DVYA and VTI?
DVYA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2838 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVYA or VTI?
DVYA yields 4.31% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DVYA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.