DWAS vs VTI
Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DWAS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWAS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $434M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.28% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.66% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.33% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.01% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 19, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
DWAS vs VTI Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DWAS returned +36.66% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, DWAS is up 21.28% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, DWAS compounded at +14.33% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.01% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, DWAS has the edge at +12.03% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DWAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.2% for DWAS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWAS charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWAS currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DWAS and VTI share 152 holdings out of 2830 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWAS or VTI?
DWAS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DWAS or VTI?
Over the past year DWAS returned +36.66% vs +23.31% for VTI, so DWAS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), DWAS annualized +12.03% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DWAS or VTI?
DWAS has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DWAS -46.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DWAS and VTI?
DWAS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DWAS and VTI?
DWAS and VTI share 152 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2830 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWAS or VTI?
DWAS yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.