DWMF vs VTI
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWMF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $35M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.08% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 201 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.93% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.53% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.22% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.64% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 10, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
DWMF vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DWMF returned +10.53% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, DWMF is up 6.93% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, DWMF compounded at +15.22% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.64% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 11.3% for DWMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for DWMF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWMF charges 0.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWMF currently yields 3.08% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DWMF and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2987 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DWMF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIG:LN | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWMF or VTI?
DWMF has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DWMF or VTI?
Over the past year DWMF returned +10.53% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DWMF annualized +6.69% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DWMF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 11.3% for DWMF. Worst drawdown: DWMF -29.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DWMF and VTI?
DWMF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DWMF and VTI?
DWMF and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2987 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWMF or VTI?
DWMF yields 3.08% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DWMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.