DWWN vs QQQ
Principal Long Duration ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DWWN or QQQ?
Long Term Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWWN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.85% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 172 | 208 |
| YTD Return | -5.15% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +11.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 21, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
DWWN vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DWWN vs QQQ Performance
Principal Long Duration ETF (DWWN) is an ETF from Principal Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, DWWN is down 5.15% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWWN charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWWN currently yields 1.85% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 54 holdings in DWWN and 101 in QQQ, totalling 94.8% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in DWWN and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 172 and 208.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DWWN and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWWN or QQQ?
DWWN has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWWN or QQQ?
DWWN yields 1.85% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so DWWN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DWWN?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.