DWWN vs VYM
Principal Long Duration ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, DWWN or VYM?
Long Term Bond against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWWN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.97% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 56 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -5.58% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.9% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Bond | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 21, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DWWN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DWWN vs VYM Performance
Principal Long Duration ETF (DWWN) is an ETF from Principal Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, DWWN is down 5.58% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWWN charges 0.19% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $4 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWWN currently yields 0.97% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 56 holdings in DWWN and 603 in VYM, totalling 95.8% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, DWWN as of Aug 18, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in DWWN and 603 in VYM, against full books of 56 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for DWWN (97.5% of the fund), and 56 for DWWN that do not appear in VYM (95.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DWWN and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWWN or VYM?
DWWN has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWWN or VYM?
DWWN yields 0.97% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than DWWN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.