DYTA vs IVV
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DYTA or IVV?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYTA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $107M | $850.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 140 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | +4.12% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.18% | +10.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.00% | +20.51%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.97% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1%Best | 12.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.7%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $13,678 | $19,064Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.9% | 38.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 30, 2023 to Nov 6, 2026 (3.6 years).
DYTA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
DYTA vs IVV Performance
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) is an ETF from Summit Global Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DYTA returned +6.18% while IVV returned +10.97%. Year to date, DYTA is up 4.12% versus a gain of 8.54% for IVV.
Over three years, DYTA compounded at +11.00% per year against +20.51% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +19.63% annualized vs +9.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 10.1% for DYTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.7% for DYTA and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYTA charges 1.32% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $3 annually, a gap of $129 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYTA currently yields 1.54% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of DYTA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 71.3% of IVV's money is in holdings DYTA also owns.
Most of DYTA is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
132 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in DYTA and 505 in IVV, against full books of 140 and 1,018.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 132 and 505 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 367 positions DYTA does not, 28.2% of the fund.
Largest: PM 0.48%, HD 0.44%, RTX 0.38%, TXN 0.38%, CRWD 0.38%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DYTA | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.94% | 8.04% | 0.90% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 6.98% | 7.51% | 0.53% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.91% | 5.95% | 0.04% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.18% | 3.74% | 0.44% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.35% | 3.06% | 0.29% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.96% | 2.47% | 0.49% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.81% | 2.44% | 0.37% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.71% | 2.45% | 0.26% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.40% | 1.55% | 0.85% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 1.65% | 1.45% | 0.20% |
100.0% of DYTA is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYTA or IVV?
DYTA has an expense ratio of 1.32% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $129 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DYTA or IVV?
Over the past year DYTA returned +6.18% vs +10.97% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DYTA annualized +9.09% vs +19.63% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DYTA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 10.1% for DYTA. Worst drawdown: DYTA -9.7% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both DYTA and IVV?
DYTA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DYTA and IVV?
100.0% of DYTA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 71.3% of IVV's is in holdings DYTA also owns. They hold 132 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in DYTA and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYTA or IVV?
DYTA yields 1.54% while IVV yields 1.09%, so DYTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DYTA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.