DYTA vs IVV
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYTA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $109M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.83% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.63% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.18% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
DYTA vs IVV Performance
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) is a ETF from Summit Global Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DYTA returned +13.63% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, DYTA is up 8.83% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, DYTA compounded at +12.18% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, DYTA has the edge at +11.13% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.2% for DYTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.7% for DYTA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYTA charges 1.32% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $3 annually, a gap of $129 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYTA currently yields 1.53% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DYTA and IVV share 0 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYTA or IVV?
DYTA has an expense ratio of 1.32% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $129 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DYTA or IVV?
Over the past year DYTA returned +13.63% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DYTA annualized +11.13% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DYTA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.2% for DYTA. Worst drawdown: DYTA -9.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DYTA and IVV?
DYTA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between DYTA and IVV?
DYTA and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYTA or IVV?
DYTA yields 1.53% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DYTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.