DYTA vs QQQ
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DYTA or QQQ?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. DYTA is less concentrated, with 41.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYTA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $107M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 140 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +6.49% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.32% | +11.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.69% | +23.05%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.7%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $13,969 | $22,207Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.9%Best | 46.9% |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 30, 2023 to Nov 11, 2026 (3.6 years).
DYTA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
DYTA vs QQQ Performance
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) is an ETF from Summit Global Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DYTA returned +7.32% while QQQ returned +11.59%. Year to date, DYTA is up 6.49% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Over three years, DYTA compounded at +11.69% per year against +23.05% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +24.81% annualized vs +9.73%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 9.9% for DYTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.7% for DYTA and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYTA charges 1.32% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $18 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYTA currently yields 1.54% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
57.0% of DYTA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 76.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings DYTA also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside DYTA. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
41 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in DYTA and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 140 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 132 and 101 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 53 positions DYTA does not, 21.1% of the fund.
Largest: SPCX 2.71%, TXN 1.08%, CRWD 1.06%, AMGN 1.00%, LIN 0.97%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DYTA | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.94% | 8.05% | 0.89% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 6.98% | 7.68% | 0.70% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.91% | 6.16% | 0.25% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.18% | 4.23% | 0.05% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.40% | 4.47% | 2.07% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.35% | 3.15% | 0.20% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.81% | 3.37% | 0.56% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.71% | 2.93% | 0.22% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.96% | 2.52% | 0.44% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.43% | 3.90% | 2.47% |
76.1% of QQQ is already inside DYTA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYTA or QQQ?
DYTA has an expense ratio of 1.32% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $114 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DYTA or QQQ?
Over the past year DYTA returned +7.32% vs +11.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DYTA annualized +9.73% vs +24.81% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DYTA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 9.9% for DYTA. Worst drawdown: DYTA -9.7% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both DYTA and QQQ?
DYTA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DYTA and QQQ?
76.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings DYTA also owns. 76.1% of QQQ's is in holdings DYTA also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in DYTA and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYTA or QQQ?
DYTA yields 1.54% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so DYTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DYTA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. DYTA is less concentrated, with 41.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.