DYTA vs QQQ
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYTA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $109M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +9.06% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.03% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.35% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DYTA vs QQQ Performance
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) is a ETF from Summit Global Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DYTA returned +14.03% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, DYTA is up 9.06% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, DYTA compounded at +12.35% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.2% for DYTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.7% for DYTA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYTA charges 1.32% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $18 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYTA currently yields 1.53% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DYTA and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 110 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYTA or QQQ?
DYTA has an expense ratio of 1.32% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $114 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DYTA or QQQ?
Over the past year DYTA returned +14.03% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DYTA annualized +11.19% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DYTA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.2% for DYTA. Worst drawdown: DYTA -9.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DYTA and QQQ?
DYTA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DYTA and QQQ?
DYTA and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 110 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYTA or QQQ?
DYTA yields 1.53% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DYTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.