EALT vs QQQ
Innovator US Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EALT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $175M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +3.15% | +15.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.53% | +24.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.07% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EALT vs QQQ Performance
Innovator US Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EALT returned +8.53% while QQQ returned +24.44%. Year to date, EALT is up 3.15% versus a gain of 15.47% for QQQ.
Over three years, EALT compounded at +13.07% per year against +25.47% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, EALT has the edge at +13.07% annualized vs +12.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.9% for EALT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for EALT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EALT charges 0.69% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $18 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EALT currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EALT and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EALT or QQQ?
EALT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EALT or QQQ?
Over the past year EALT returned +8.53% vs +24.44% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), EALT annualized +13.07% vs +12.99% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EALT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.9% for EALT. Worst drawdown: EALT -14.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EALT and QQQ?
EALT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EALT and QQQ?
EALT and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EALT or QQQ?
EALT yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.