EAOK vs IVV
iShares ESG Aware 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAOK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.16% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +2.20% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.40% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.12% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.53% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
EAOK vs IVV Performance
iShares ESG Aware 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EAOK returned +6.40% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, EAOK is up 2.20% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, EAOK compounded at +8.12% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +2.53% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.9% for EAOK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for EAOK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAOK charges 0.18% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAOK currently yields 3.16% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EAOK and IVV share 1 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EAOK | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAOK or IVV?
EAOK has an expense ratio of 0.18% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EAOK or IVV?
Over the past year EAOK returned +6.40% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EAOK annualized +3.94% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EAOK or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.9% for EAOK. Worst drawdown: EAOK -19.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EAOK and IVV?
EAOK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EAOK and IVV?
EAOK and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAOK or IVV?
EAOK yields 3.16% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EAOK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.