EAOK vs VTI
iShares ESG Aware 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAOK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.16% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.20% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.40% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.12% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.53% | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
EAOK vs VTI Performance
iShares ESG Aware 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EAOK returned +6.40% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, EAOK is up 2.20% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, EAOK compounded at +8.12% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.53% and +12.33% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.9% for EAOK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for EAOK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAOK charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAOK currently yields 3.16% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EAOK and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAOK or VTI?
EAOK has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EAOK or VTI?
Over the past year EAOK returned +6.40% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EAOK annualized +3.94% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EAOK or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.9% for EAOK. Worst drawdown: EAOK -19.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EAOK and VTI?
EAOK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EAOK and VTI?
EAOK and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAOK or VTI?
EAOK yields 3.16% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EAOK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.