EDC vs VTI
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EDC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $168M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.70% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +73.45% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +43.72% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.39% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
EDC vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X ETF (EDC) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDC returned +73.45% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, EDC is up 26.70% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, EDC compounded at +43.72% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.39% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs -0.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.9% for EDC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDC charges 1.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $3 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDC currently yields 1.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EDC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDC or VTI?
EDC has an expense ratio of 1.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $106 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDC or VTI?
Over the past year EDC returned +73.45% vs +21.12% for VTI, so EDC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), EDC annualized -0.92% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDC or VTI?
EDC has been the more volatile fund at 58.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EDC -92.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EDC and VTI?
EDC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDC and VTI?
EDC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDC or VTI?
EDC yields 1.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EDC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.