EDGQ vs VTI
Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EDGQ or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
EDGQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDGQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $12M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.84% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +22.72%Best | +14.72% |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.78% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 17, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EDGQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EDGQ vs VTI Performance
Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EDGQ is up 22.72% versus a gain of 14.72% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDGQ charges 0.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDGQ currently yields 6.84% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in EDGQ and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, EDGQ as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in EDGQ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 10 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDGQ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDGQ or VTI?
EDGQ has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. EDGQ is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDGQ or VTI?
EDGQ yields 6.84% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EDGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EDGQ?
EDGQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.