EDI vs QQQ

EDI vs QQQ

Which is better, EDI or QQQ?

We do not have enough on EDI and QQQ to separate them.

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEDIQQQ
Expense Ratio-0.18%
AUM-$483.5B
Dividend Yield-0.44%
Holdings-107
YTD Price Return-+16.60%
1Y Price Return-+22.39%
3Y Price Return (annualized)-+24.26%
5Y Price Return (annualized)-+13.71%
Volatility (annualized)-30.6%
Max Drawdown--83.0%
Fund FamilyVirtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Total Income FundInvesco (US)
Category-Equity
Style-Large Cap Growth
Inception-Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for EDI. We have no price series for EDI, so there is nothing to compare it against.

EDI vs QQQ Performance

Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Total Income Fund (EDI) is an ETF from Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Total Income Fund and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US).

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EDI and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EDIQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is QQQ better than EDI?

We hold very little data on EDI and QQQ, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.