EEM vs RWEM

EEM vs RWEM

Which is better, EEM or RWEM?

RWEM has been ahead.

RWEM has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.5%.

Lower Fees: RWEMHigher Returns (1Y): RWEMLess Concentrated: RWEM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEEMRWEM
Expense Ratio0.72%0.52%Best
AUM$27.0B$61M
Dividend Yield1.77%1.93%
Holdings2,510479
YTD Return+10.89%Best+10.37%
1Y Return+13.83%+16.26%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+20.26%-
5Y Return (annualized)+6.12%-
Top 10 Weight37.5%33.0%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)The Advisors Inner Circle Fund
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 7, 2003Dec 15, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

EEM vs RWEM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare EEM against instead:EEM vs SPYEEM vs QQQEEM vs VOOEEM vs VTIRWEM against:RWEM vs VXUS

EEM vs RWEM Performance

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Over the past year EEM returned +13.83% while RWEM returned +16.26%. Year to date, EEM is up 10.89% versus a gain of 10.37% for RWEM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EEM charges 0.72% per year while RWEM charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $52 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEM currently yields 1.77% against 1.93% for RWEM.

Holdings Overlap

EEM already in RWEM32.9%
RWEM already in EEM58.5%

32.9% of EEM's money is in holdings RWEM also owns. 58.5% of RWEM's money is in holdings EEM also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

142 positions in common, counted across the 1,168 positions we hold weights for in EEM and 233 in RWEM, against full books of 2,510 and 479.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EEMWeight in RWEMDifference
2330:TWTsmc15.95%9.88%6.07%
000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 50004.89%3.58%1.31%
2308:TWDelta Electronics Inc0.90%3.29%2.39%
2454:TWMediaTek Inc ORD TWD101.68%1.44%0.24%
2360:TWChroma Ate Inc0.21%1.35%1.14%
2345:TWAccton Technology Corp0.27%1.13%0.86%
316140:KRWoori Financial Group Inc0.12%1.22%1.10%
5274:TWAspeed Technology Inc0.15%0.89%0.74%
402340:KRSk Square0.49%0.55%0.06%
3034:TWNovatek Microelectronics Corp0.08%0.93%0.85%

58.5% of RWEM is already inside EEM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

EEMRWEM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EEM or RWEM?

EEM has an expense ratio of 0.72% while RWEM charges 0.52%. RWEM is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EEM or RWEM?

Over the past year EEM returned +13.83% vs +16.26% for RWEM, so RWEM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between EEM and RWEM?

58.5% of RWEM's money is in holdings EEM also owns. 58.5% of RWEM's is in holdings EEM also owns. They hold 142 positions in common, counted across the 1,168 positions we hold weights for in EEM and 233 in RWEM.

Which pays a higher dividend, EEM or RWEM?

EEM yields 1.77% while RWEM yields 1.93%, so RWEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RWEM better than EEM?

RWEM has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.