EEMO vs VTI
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EEMO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.02% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 281 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.31% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.94% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.96% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.17% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
EEMO vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEMO returned +29.94% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, EEMO is up 24.31% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, EEMO compounded at +18.96% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.17% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +0.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.5% for EEMO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMO charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMO currently yields 2.02% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EEMO and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3031 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMO or VTI?
EEMO has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMO or VTI?
Over the past year EEMO returned +29.94% vs +22.43% for VTI, so EEMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMO annualized +0.09% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMO or VTI?
EEMO has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EEMO -60.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EEMO and VTI?
EEMO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMO and VTI?
EEMO and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3031 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMO or VTI?
EEMO yields 2.02% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EEMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.