EEMO vs VXUS
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EEMO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $26M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.02% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 281 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +25.15% | +15.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.60% | +27.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.00% | +20.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.17% | +8.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2012 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EEMO vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEMO returned +30.60% while VXUS returned +27.46%. Year to date, EEMO is up 25.15% versus a gain of 15.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, EEMO compounded at +18.00% per year against +20.30% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.17% and +8.96% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.90% annualized vs +0.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.5% for EEMO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMO charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMO currently yields 2.02% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EEMO and VXUS share 168 holdings out of 8168 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMO or VXUS?
EEMO has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMO or VXUS?
Over the past year EEMO returned +30.60% vs +27.46% for VXUS, so EEMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMO annualized +0.14% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMO or VXUS?
EEMO has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EEMO -60.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EEMO and VXUS?
EEMO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMO and VXUS?
EEMO and VXUS share 168 common holdings with a 3.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8168 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMO or VXUS?
EEMO yields 2.02% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.