EEV vs VTI
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.08% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -33.63% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | -49.76% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -32.33% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -16.21% | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
EEV vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEV returned -49.76% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, EEV is down 33.63% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, EEV compounded at -32.33% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -16.21% and +12.33% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -25.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for EEV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEV charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEV currently yields 8.08% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EEV and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEV or VTI?
EEV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEV or VTI?
Over the past year EEV returned -49.76% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EEV annualized -25.81% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEV or VTI?
EEV has been the more volatile fund at 37.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EEV -99.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EEV and VTI?
EEV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEV and VTI?
EEV and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEV or VTI?
EEV yields 8.08% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EEV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.