EEV vs VYM
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.23% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -38.72% | +14.95% | |
| 1Y Return | -52.50% | +21.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -34.46% | +18.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -17.78% | +12.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EEV vs VYM Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEV returned -52.50% while VYM returned +21.14%. Year to date, EEV is down 38.72% versus a gain of 14.95% for VYM.
Over three years, EEV compounded at -34.46% per year against +18.69% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -17.78% and +12.00% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs -26.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for EEV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEV charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEV currently yields 7.23% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EEV and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEV or VYM?
EEV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEV or VYM?
Over the past year EEV returned -52.50% vs +21.14% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EEV annualized -26.07% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEV or VYM?
EEV has been the more volatile fund at 37.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EEV -99.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EEV and VYM?
EEV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEV and VYM?
EEV and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEV or VYM?
EEV yields 7.23% while VYM yields 2.24%, so EEV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.