EIPX vs SCHD
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIPX | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $560M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 92 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +21.58% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.64% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.09% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EIPX vs SCHD Performance
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EIPX returned +28.64% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, EIPX is up 21.58% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, EIPX compounded at +19.09% per year against +15.08% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, EIPX has the edge at +17.30% annualized vs +11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 13.1% for EIPX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for EIPX and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIPX charges 0.95% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $6 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIPX currently yields 2.72% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EIPX and SCHD share 5 holdings out of 183 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIPX or SCHD?
EIPX has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EIPX or SCHD?
Over the past year EIPX returned +28.64% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EIPX annualized +17.30% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EIPX or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 13.1% for EIPX. Worst drawdown: EIPX -15.4% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EIPX and SCHD?
EIPX and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EIPX and SCHD?
EIPX and SCHD share 5 common holdings with a 4.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 183 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIPX or SCHD?
EIPX yields 2.72% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.