EIPX vs VXUS
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EIPX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIPX | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $576M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.68% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 91 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +26.17% | +15.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.30% | +26.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.29% | +20.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EIPX vs VXUS Performance
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EIPX returned +31.30% while VXUS returned +26.73%. Year to date, EIPX is up 26.17% versus a gain of 15.52% for VXUS.
Over three years, EIPX compounded at +20.29% per year against +20.35% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, EIPX has the edge at +18.17% annualized vs +4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.0% for EIPX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for EIPX and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIPX charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIPX currently yields 2.68% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EIPX and VXUS share 15 holdings out of 7942 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIPX or VXUS?
EIPX has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EIPX or VXUS?
Over the past year EIPX returned +31.30% vs +26.73% for VXUS, so EIPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EIPX annualized +18.17% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EIPX or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.0% for EIPX. Worst drawdown: EIPX -15.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EIPX and VXUS?
EIPX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EIPX and VXUS?
EIPX and VXUS share 15 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7942 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIPX or VXUS?
EIPX yields 2.68% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so EIPX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.