ELCV vs FTGS
Eventide High Dividend ETF vs First Trust Growth Strength ETF
Quick Verdict
ELCV has a lower expense ratio. ELCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 50 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ELCV | FTGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $251M | $1.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.06% | 0.09% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +21.26% | +13.02% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.07% | +14.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -20.0% | |
| Fund Family | Eventide | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2024 | Oct 25, 2022 |
ELCV vs FTGS Performance
Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) is a ETF from Eventide and First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year ELCV returned +27.07% while FTGS returned +14.71%. Year to date, ELCV is up 21.26% versus a gain of 13.02% for FTGS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.9% for ELCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for ELCV and -20.0% for FTGS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ELCV charges 0.49% per year while FTGS charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $60 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ELCV currently yields 2.06% against 0.09% for FTGS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ELCV or FTGS?
ELCV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while FTGS charges 0.60%. ELCV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ELCV or FTGS?
Over the past year ELCV returned +27.07% vs +14.71% for FTGS, so ELCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ELCV annualized +16.47% vs +19.91% for FTGS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ELCV or FTGS?
FTGS has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.9% for ELCV. Worst drawdown: ELCV -18.4% vs FTGS -20.0%.
Should I hold both ELCV and FTGS?
ELCV and FTGS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ELCV and FTGS?
ELCV and FTGS share 2 common holdings with a 3.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 94 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ELCV or FTGS?
ELCV yields 2.06% while FTGS yields 0.09%, so ELCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.