ELD vs SCHD
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. ELD offers more diversification with 235 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ELD | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $143M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.98% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 235 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +2.50% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.19% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.19% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.2% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2010 | Oct 20, 2011 |
ELD vs SCHD Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ELD returned +8.19% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, ELD is up 2.50% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, ELD compounded at +7.55% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +3.19% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs -1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 11.1% for ELD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.2% for ELD and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ELD charges 0.55% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $6 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ELD currently yields 5.98% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
ELD and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 102 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ELD or SCHD?
ELD has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ELD or SCHD?
Over the past year ELD returned +8.19% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), ELD annualized -1.69% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ELD or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 11.1% for ELD. Worst drawdown: ELD -52.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ELD and SCHD?
ELD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ELD and SCHD?
ELD and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 102 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ELD or SCHD?
ELD yields 5.98% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so ELD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.