EMBD vs SCHD
EMBD vs SCHD
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMBD | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $249M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.65% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 234 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +1.70% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.18% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.84% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.85% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2020 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EMBD vs SCHD Performance
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EMBD returned +6.18% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, EMBD is up 1.70% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, EMBD compounded at +8.84% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +2.85% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +3.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 8.8% for EMBD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.0% for EMBD and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMBD charges 0.39% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $6 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMBD currently yields 5.65% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EMBD and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 177 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMBD or SCHD?
EMBD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMBD or SCHD?
Over the past year EMBD returned +6.18% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EMBD annualized +3.33% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMBD or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 8.8% for EMBD. Worst drawdown: EMBD -25.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EMBD and SCHD?
EMBD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMBD and SCHD?
EMBD and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 177 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMBD or SCHD?
EMBD yields 5.65% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so EMBD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.