EMGF vs IVV
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMGF delivered stronger 1-year returns. EMGF offers more diversification with 702 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMGF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 702 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +20.32% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.66% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.84% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.01% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
EMGF vs IVV Performance
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMGF returned +35.66% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, EMGF is up 20.32% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, EMGF compounded at +24.84% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.01% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, EMGF has the edge at +10.38% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.2% for EMGF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMGF charges 0.26% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $3 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMGF currently yields 2.14% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMGF or IVV?
EMGF has an expense ratio of 0.26% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMGF or IVV?
Over the past year EMGF returned +35.66% vs +20.94% for IVV, so EMGF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), EMGF annualized +10.38% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMGF or IVV?
EMGF has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMGF -40.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMGF and IVV?
EMGF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMGF and IVV?
EMGF and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1173 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMGF or IVV?
EMGF yields 2.14% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EMGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.