EMHY vs IVV
iShares JP Morgan Emerging Market High Yield Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. EMHY offers more diversification with 684 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMHY | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $642M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.49% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 684 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.24% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.52% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.18% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.56% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
EMHY vs IVV Performance
iShares JP Morgan Emerging Market High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMHY returned +4.52% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, EMHY is down 0.24% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, EMHY compounded at +11.18% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.56% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.9% for EMHY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for EMHY and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMHY charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMHY currently yields 6.49% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EMHY and IVV share 1 holdings out of 641 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMHY | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 1.35% | 0.15% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMHY or IVV?
EMHY has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMHY or IVV?
Over the past year EMHY returned +4.52% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), EMHY annualized +4.55% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMHY or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.9% for EMHY. Worst drawdown: EMHY -58.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMHY and IVV?
EMHY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMHY and IVV?
EMHY and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 641 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMHY or IVV?
EMHY yields 6.49% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EMHY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.