EMKT vs VYM
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EMKT or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EMKT led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMKT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | - | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 82 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +24.28%Best | +10.24% |
| 1Y Return | +25.94%Best | +14.89% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.00% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.0% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Lazard Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
EMKT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMKT vs VYM Performance
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMKT returned +25.94% while VYM returned +14.89%. Year to date, EMKT is up 24.28% versus a gain of 10.24% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMKT charges 0.74% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $4 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMKT currently yields 0.44% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 212 holdings in EMKT and 557 in VYM, totalling 99.8% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 212 positions we hold weights for in EMKT and 557 in VYM, against full books of 82 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EMKT (97.1% of the fund), and 2 for EMKT that do not appear in VYM (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMKT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMKT or VYM?
EMKT has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMKT or VYM?
Over the past year EMKT returned +25.94% vs +14.89% for VYM, so EMKT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMKT or VYM?
EMKT yields 0.44% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EMKT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EMKT led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.