EMKT vs VTI
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMKT or VTI?
EMKT has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMKT led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMKT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 82 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +24.47%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Fund Family | Lazard Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EMKT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMKT vs VTI Performance
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EMKT is up 24.47% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMKT charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMKT currently yields 0.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 219 holdings in EMKT and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 99.7% and 92.3% of the two funds. That is not enough of VTI to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, EMKT as of Aug 17, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 219 positions we hold weights for in EMKT and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 82 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMKT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPGPPg Photonics Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMKT and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMKT or VTI?
EMKT has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMKT or VTI?
EMKT yields 0.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMKT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMKT led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.