EMKT vs VTI
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMKT or VTI?
EMKT has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMKT led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMKT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 430 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +23.51%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +25.16%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.3% | 13.1%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Lazard Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
EMKT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMKT vs VTI Performance
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMKT returned +25.16% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, EMKT is up 23.51% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMKT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMKT charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMKT currently yields 0.44% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 212 holdings in EMKT and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, EMKT as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 212 positions we hold weights for in EMKT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 430 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EMKT (97.5% of the fund), and 2 for EMKT that do not appear in VTI (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMKT and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMKT or VTI?
EMKT has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMKT or VTI?
Over the past year EMKT returned +25.16% vs +15.92% for VTI, so EMKT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMKT or VTI?
EMKT has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI.
Should I hold both EMKT and VTI?
EMKT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMKT or VTI?
EMKT yields 0.44% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMKT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMKT led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.