EMQQ vs IVV
The Emerging Markets Internet ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMQQ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $265M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.02% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -17.53% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.54% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.27% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.40% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Exchange Traded Concepts Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
EMQQ vs IVV Performance
The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is a ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMQQ returned -17.54% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, EMQQ is down 17.53% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, EMQQ compounded at +4.27% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -7.40% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +2.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for EMQQ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMQQ charges 0.86% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMQQ currently yields 4.02% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EMQQ and IVV share 0 holdings out of 565 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMQQ or IVV?
EMQQ has an expense ratio of 0.86% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMQQ or IVV?
Over the past year EMQQ returned -17.54% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EMQQ annualized +2.98% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMQQ or IVV?
EMQQ has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMQQ -73.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMQQ and IVV?
EMQQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMQQ and IVV?
EMQQ and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 565 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMQQ or IVV?
EMQQ yields 4.02% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EMQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.