EMQQ vs VTI
The Emerging Markets Internet ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMQQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $275M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.67% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -17.43% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.35% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.28% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.85% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Exchange Traded Concepts Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
EMQQ vs VTI Performance
The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is a ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMQQ returned -17.35% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, EMQQ is down 17.43% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, EMQQ compounded at +6.28% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -5.85% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for EMQQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMQQ charges 0.86% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMQQ currently yields 3.67% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EMQQ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2847 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMQQ or VTI?
EMQQ has an expense ratio of 0.86% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMQQ or VTI?
Over the past year EMQQ returned -17.35% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EMQQ annualized +2.99% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMQQ or VTI?
EMQQ has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMQQ -73.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMQQ and VTI?
EMQQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMQQ and VTI?
EMQQ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2847 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMQQ or VTI?
EMQQ yields 3.67% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EMQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.