ETEC vs IVV
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ETEC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETEC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 61 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +9.22% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.40% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.36% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
ETEC vs IVV Performance
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ETEC returned +29.40% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, ETEC is up 9.22% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, ETEC compounded at +5.36% per year against +21.47% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for ETEC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETEC charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETEC currently yields 0.43% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ETEC and IVV share 5 holdings out of 548 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETEC or IVV?
ETEC has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ETEC or IVV?
Over the past year ETEC returned +29.40% vs +22.61% for IVV, so ETEC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ETEC annualized +3.20% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ETEC or IVV?
ETEC has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ETEC -39.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ETEC and IVV?
ETEC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ETEC and IVV?
ETEC and IVV share 5 common holdings with a 2.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 548 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETEC or IVV?
ETEC yields 0.43% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.