ETW vs IZRL
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. ETW delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 259 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETW | IZRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $936M | $142M | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.41% | 2.55% | |
| Holdings | 291 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +12.63% | +0.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.70% | +11.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.82% | +15.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.41% | +0.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 23.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.8% | -60.0% | |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2005 | Dec 4, 2017 |
ETW vs IZRL Performance
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is a ETF from Eaton Vance and ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year ETW returned +19.70% while IZRL returned +11.14%. Year to date, ETW is up 12.63% versus a gain of 0.27% for IZRL.
Over three years, ETW compounded at +16.82% per year against +15.81% for IZRL; over five years the annualized figures are +6.41% and +0.21% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IZRL has the edge at +5.51% annualized vs -1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 16.9% for ETW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for ETW and -60.0% for IZRL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETW charges 1.10% per year while IZRL charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $49 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETW currently yields 7.41% against 2.55% for IZRL.
Holdings Overlap
ETW and IZRL share 0 holdings out of 325 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETW or IZRL?
ETW has an expense ratio of 1.10% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ETW or IZRL?
Over the past year ETW returned +19.70% vs +11.14% for IZRL, so ETW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ETW annualized -1.06% vs +5.51% for IZRL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ETW or IZRL?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 16.9% for ETW. Worst drawdown: ETW -72.8% vs IZRL -60.0%.
Should I hold both ETW and IZRL?
ETW and IZRL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ETW and IZRL?
ETW and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 325 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETW or IZRL?
ETW yields 7.41% while IZRL yields 2.55%, so ETW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.