ETW vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricETWIVVWinner
Expense Ratio1.10%0.03%
AUM$936M$865.2B
Dividend Yield7.41%1.09%
Holdings291508
YTD Return+10.92%+13.80%
1Y Return+20.02%+23.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.89%+21.49%
5Y Return (annualized)+6.21%+13.43%
Volatility (annualized)16.9%15.1%
Max Drawdown-72.8%-56.5%
Fund FamilyEaton VanceiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionSep 30, 2005May 15, 2000

ETW vs IVV Performance

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is a ETF from Eaton Vance and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ETW returned +20.02% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, ETW is up 10.92% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.

Over three years, ETW compounded at +15.89% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.21% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs -1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ETW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for ETW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ETW charges 1.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $3 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETW currently yields 7.41% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

40.6%overlap

ETW and IVV share 110 holdings out of 654 unique holdings combined, representing a 40.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ETWWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA4.84%7.76%2.92%
AAPL4.43%7.44%3.01%
MSFT3.30%4.57%1.27%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings ETW shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ETW or IVV?

ETW has an expense ratio of 1.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $107 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ETW or IVV?

Over the past year ETW returned +20.02% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), ETW annualized -1.13% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ETW or IVV?

ETW has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ETW -72.8% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both ETW and IVV?

ETW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ETW and IVV?

ETW and IVV share 110 common holdings with a 40.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 654 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ETW or IVV?

ETW yields 7.41% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ETW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →