ETW vs KF
ETW vs KF
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund vs The Korea Fund, Inc.
Quick Verdict
KF delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 259 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETW | KF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | - | |
| AUM | $936M | $285M | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.41% | 1.57% | |
| Holdings | 291 | 52 | |
| YTD Return | +10.92% | +55.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.02% | +121.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.89% | +40.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.21% | +15.19% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 43.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.8% | -77.0% | |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2005 | Aug 29, 1984 |
ETW vs KF Performance
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is a ETF from Eaton Vance and The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) is a ETF from The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF). Over the past year ETW returned +20.02% while KF returned +121.76%. Year to date, ETW is up 10.92% versus a gain of 55.19% for KF.
Over three years, ETW compounded at +15.89% per year against +40.09% for KF; over five years the annualized figures are +6.21% and +15.19% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, KF has the edge at +16.27% annualized vs -1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.4% compared with 16.9% for ETW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for ETW and -77.0% for KF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
ETW and KF share 0 holdings out of 308 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, ETW or KF?
Over the past year ETW returned +20.02% vs +121.76% for KF, so KF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), ETW annualized -1.13% vs +16.27% for KF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ETW or KF?
KF has been the more volatile fund at 43.4% annualized versus 16.9% for ETW. Worst drawdown: ETW -72.8% vs KF -77.0%.
Should I hold both ETW and KF?
ETW and KF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ETW and KF?
ETW and KF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 308 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETW or KF?
ETW yields 7.41% while KF yields 1.57%, so ETW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.