EUM vs IVV
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EUM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.31% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -17.57% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -26.59% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -15.85% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.23% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
EUM vs IVV Performance
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EUM returned -26.59% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, EUM is down 17.57% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, EUM compounded at -15.85% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -6.23% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EUM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.0% for EUM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EUM charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EUM currently yields 4.31% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EUM and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EUM or IVV?
EUM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EUM or IVV?
Over the past year EUM returned -26.59% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EUM annualized -10.46% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EUM or IVV?
EUM has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EUM -94.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EUM and IVV?
EUM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EUM and IVV?
EUM and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EUM or IVV?
EUM yields 4.31% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EUM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.