EUM vs QQQ
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EUM or QQQ?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.66, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EUM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.24% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 7 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -18.20% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | -22.85% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -16.58% | +25.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.97% | +15.24%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 18.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -94.0% | -53.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,968 | $20,324Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2007 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.9 years).
EUM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EUM vs QQQ Performance
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) is an ETF from ProShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EUM returned -22.85% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, EUM is down 18.20% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, EUM compounded at -16.58% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -6.97% and +15.24% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +14.91% annualized vs -10.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EUM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 18.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.0% for EUM and -53.3% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.66. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EUM charges 0.95% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $18 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EUM currently yields 4.24% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in EUM and 102 in QQQ, totalling 61.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in EUM and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 7 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EUM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EUM or QQQ?
EUM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EUM or QQQ?
Over the past year EUM returned -22.85% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EUM annualized -10.44% vs +14.91% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EUM or QQQ?
EUM has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 18.9% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: EUM -94.0% vs QQQ -53.3%.
Should I hold both EUM and QQQ?
EUM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.66, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EUM or QQQ?
EUM yields 4.24% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EUM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EUM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.66, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.