EVMT vs VTI
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EVMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EVMT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.54% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 15 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.26% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.45% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.25% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 27, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
EVMT vs VTI Performance
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EVMT returned +29.45% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, EVMT is up 5.26% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, EVMT compounded at +2.25% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EVMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.3% for EVMT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EVMT charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EVMT currently yields 11.54% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EVMT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EVMT or VTI?
EVMT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EVMT or VTI?
Over the past year EVMT returned +29.45% vs +24.16% for VTI, so EVMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EVMT annualized -7.20% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EVMT or VTI?
EVMT has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EVMT -48.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EVMT and VTI?
EVMT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EVMT and VTI?
EVMT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EVMT or VTI?
EVMT yields 11.54% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EVMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.